-
(via aliciahannahnaomi)
-
![With my job [i wash people’s hands all the day] i met lots of ex-cutters.I’ve given them the most awesome treatments, and i used the most caring words i could.They’ve been thru hard times, the less that i can do is giving them some happiness in form of a colorful, nice smelling soap.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4e2ofgaYI1qlvr5bo1_1280.jpg)
With my job [i wash people’s hands all the day] i met lots of ex-cutters.
I’ve given them the most awesome treatments, and i used the most caring words i could.
They’ve been thru hard times, the less that i can do is giving them some happiness in form of a colorful, nice smelling soap.(via ladyunlaced)
-
MY LIFE.
ANXIETY + A CAT
Only, my cat is white. -
Ranya Mordanova photographed by Naomi Yang, styled by Yoko Miyake
-
(via syringes-and-lace)
-
-
![Bambi [yes my bag has a name], love of my life.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4aix0UZoC1rtdnr9o1_500.jpg)
Bambi [yes my bag has a name], love of my life.
(via schizoblitz)
-
jean baptiste mondino : eva herzigova
(via metempsicosi)
-
Dress - One Teaspoon / Jacket - Vintage / Heels - Jeffrey Campbell / Purse - Cambridge Satchel Co. (image: agogofashion)
Perfect outfit! -
The Beloved Witch – Ugo Richard for 160 Magazine Vol.11
(via fuckyeahfashiongothgirl)
-
(via perfectly-horrid)
-
(via heynichole)
-
![ladyunlaced:
tristaneoftheuniverse:
meandrous:
babyslime:
bloggitty-blog-blog:
caffeinatedfeminist:
littlemisslillykat:
inday-en-en:
No. You had sex with a girl when you were a child. It ended in pregnancy. You are attacking the morality of a 14 year old girl who terminated a pregnancy that would have resulted in a child that neither you or her had the capacity to care for. A girl that preserved your and her own youth, and stopped a child being raised in circumstances that are not fit for any child. You really should be assessing your own morality. What kind of 14 year old boy fucks a 14 year old girl, without protection, gets her pregnant and then runs an online smear campaign against her for doing what was best for her, her family and you? What? You think you had the capacity to raise a child at age 14/15? How would you feed it or look after it? You wouldn’t. You were going to dump it on her or your own parents, live like the carefree little shit you are and occasionally play with the child when you could be bothered and think “Wow, what a good, brave young father I am.” You made the mistake, she went through the trauma of saving your youth for you. You owe her so much better than this. You absolutely disgust me. Less than forward-slash three, you’re real fucking remorseful. That’s poetry that is. You’re breaking my heart kid. That girl should have every right to decide what she wants to do to her body. The idea that you should take responsibility and give birth implies that you are responsible to this fetus and you owe it something. A pregnant person does not owe a fetus anything any more than they owe you an apology for being alive. Try again, pro lifers. Pro-Choice.
I applaud this.
^ YESS.
This is some sterling commentary.
This dumbass is also probably assuming the fetus was male. The sex is almost never known when an abortion takes place because it is early on into the pregnancy.
Going with this good ol’ fashioned love story, I’d like to point out: “Why must the fetus pay the price of the parents mistakes?”. I do not condone them having unprotected sex at 14, it is stupid. What were they expecting. But that’s all irrelevant in the eyes of the fetus. That child has no awareness of the fact that its parents are 14 years old but now it has lost the right to life because of its parents. And here the male is being blamed for not using a condom, yet [correct if I’m wrong] doesn’t it take two to tango? It’s not just the males fault, but also the female. She lost her right to her body when she let him inside her, so anything she says about how it is her body is utter b.s. If it is all about the body, what about the fetus’ body? Is the fetus now allowed rights? And if you wish to hit me with the argument that it’s not yet a person, that too is utter b.s. Here’s a curious yet interesting perspective to take [bear with me as I explain]: A common trend amongst serial killers is their justification for murder. Many of them claim that their victims were not yet human, they were empty. Similar to the viewpoint taken by pro-choicers. Both say that their ‘victims’ are not yet people. So how come these serial killers get sent down and not pro-choicers? What is it about birth that makes people so special? Is it at birth when a human becomes “Human”? It’s hard to tell. But the wheels are set in motion at conception. The baby has been made when the egg is fertilised. I told you its a curious method of looking at it, but think: “Both the serial killers and the pro-choicers put forward the same justification for why they killed”. Do you like this juxtaposition? With this entire argument I wish to yet again state that I am not on these children’s side, I am completely against what they did as it was stupid in every sense of the word. This is why we have an age of consent, et cetera. But that is no reason to kill the baby. In all seriousness, the baby should have been taken off them at birth. But that’s yet again another human being who has had the right to life stolen from them because some uptight women feel that their body is more precious than that of a baby. Nice move there. It shows real respect for other people, great empathy skills. Try again, pro-choicers. Pro-life.
She lost her right to her body when she let him inside her.
She lost her right to her body when she let him inside her.
As women, we do not deserve rights if we engage in sexual activity. Let that sink in for a minute. The pro-life side everybody!
SHE LOST HER RIGHT TO HER BODY WHEN SHE LET HIM INSIDE HER.
Uh no! To say that a woman losses her right to HER BODY when she decides to have sex is absurd. If that’s the case then that provides free reign to make women slaves. A woman’s body is HER BODY before and AFTER SHE HAS SEX and it’s her decision if she doesn’t want to be pregnant end of story.
I bolded the bit about her body not being her own. I am disgusted to see that. Also, how ridiculous at it that the woman has no right to her body after sex, but the unborn, undeveloped, non-cognizant fetus has the right to its body -a body that is not even fully human and is essentially a parasite to the young girl whose body is in no way ready to be pregnant and have birth. Yes, she had sex, but no, she should not be shamed and looked down upon for it. With the media we have today it’s no wonder she had sex at 14 -woman are taught from a young age that their sex appeal is one of the most important things about themselves, and if they’re not sexually pleasing a man then they are worthless and prude. Even at the age of 14.
Check yourself pro-lifers.
This is DISGUSTING.A girl NEVER loses the right to her body, because it’s hers.Her body, her life, her choices. You can agree or you can disagree, anyone is allowed to have different ideas and conceptions about morals, religion etc. Still: who’s the uterus? =)If you don’t agree go make a pro-lifer 14yo daughter pregnant, i’m sure they’ll thank you for that.](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcxdjhrUqe1qdz2x9o1_500.gif)
She lost her right to her body when she let him inside her.No. You had sex with a girl when you were a child. It ended in pregnancy. You are attacking the morality of a 14 year old girl who terminated a pregnancy that would have resulted in a child that neither you or her had the capacity to care for. A girl that preserved your and her own youth, and stopped a child being raised in circumstances that are not fit for any child. You really should be assessing your own morality. What kind of 14 year old boy fucks a 14 year old girl, without protection, gets her pregnant and then runs an online smear campaign against her for doing what was best for her, her family and you? What? You think you had the capacity to raise a child at age 14/15? How would you feed it or look after it? You wouldn’t. You were going to dump it on her or your own parents, live like the carefree little shit you are and occasionally play with the child when you could be bothered and think “Wow, what a good, brave young father I am.” You made the mistake, she went through the trauma of saving your youth for you. You owe her so much better than this. You absolutely disgust me. Less than forward-slash three, you’re real fucking remorseful. That’s poetry that is. You’re breaking my heart kid. That girl should have every right to decide what she wants to do to her body. The idea that you should take responsibility and give birth implies that you are responsible to this fetus and you owe it something. A pregnant person does not owe a fetus anything any more than they owe you an apology for being alive. Try again, pro lifers. Pro-Choice.
I applaud this.
^ YESS.
This is some sterling commentary.
This dumbass is also probably assuming the fetus was male. The sex is almost never known when an abortion takes place because it is early on into the pregnancy.
Going with this good ol’ fashioned love story, I’d like to point out: “Why must the fetus pay the price of the parents mistakes?”. I do not condone them having unprotected sex at 14, it is stupid. What were they expecting. But that’s all irrelevant in the eyes of the fetus. That child has no awareness of the fact that its parents are 14 years old but now it has lost the right to life because of its parents. And here the male is being blamed for not using a condom, yet [correct if I’m wrong] doesn’t it take two to tango? It’s not just the males fault, but also the female. She lost her right to her body when she let him inside her, so anything she says about how it is her body is utter b.s. If it is all about the body, what about the fetus’ body? Is the fetus now allowed rights? And if you wish to hit me with the argument that it’s not yet a person, that too is utter b.s. Here’s a curious yet interesting perspective to take [bear with me as I explain]: A common trend amongst serial killers is their justification for murder. Many of them claim that their victims were not yet human, they were empty. Similar to the viewpoint taken by pro-choicers. Both say that their ‘victims’ are not yet people. So how come these serial killers get sent down and not pro-choicers? What is it about birth that makes people so special? Is it at birth when a human becomes “Human”? It’s hard to tell. But the wheels are set in motion at conception. The baby has been made when the egg is fertilised. I told you its a curious method of looking at it, but think: “Both the serial killers and the pro-choicers put forward the same justification for why they killed”. Do you like this juxtaposition? With this entire argument I wish to yet again state that I am not on these children’s side, I am completely against what they did as it was stupid in every sense of the word. This is why we have an age of consent, et cetera. But that is no reason to kill the baby. In all seriousness, the baby should have been taken off them at birth. But that’s yet again another human being who has had the right to life stolen from them because some uptight women feel that their body is more precious than that of a baby. Nice move there. It shows real respect for other people, great empathy skills. Try again, pro-choicers. Pro-life.
She lost her right to her body when she let him inside her.
As women, we do not deserve rights if we engage in sexual activity. Let that sink in for a minute. The pro-life side everybody!
SHE LOST HER RIGHT TO HER BODY WHEN SHE LET HIM INSIDE HER.
Uh no! To say that a woman losses her right to HER BODY when she decides to have sex is absurd. If that’s the case then that provides free reign to make women slaves. A woman’s body is HER BODY before and AFTER SHE HAS SEX and it’s her decision if she doesn’t want to be pregnant end of story.
I bolded the bit about her body not being her own. I am disgusted to see that. Also, how ridiculous at it that the woman has no right to her body after sex, but the unborn, undeveloped, non-cognizant fetus has the right to its body -a body that is not even fully human and is essentially a parasite to the young girl whose body is in no way ready to be pregnant and have birth. Yes, she had sex, but no, she should not be shamed and looked down upon for it. With the media we have today it’s no wonder she had sex at 14 -woman are taught from a young age that their sex appeal is one of the most important things about themselves, and if they’re not sexually pleasing a man then they are worthless and prude. Even at the age of 14.
Check yourself pro-lifers.
This is DISGUSTING.
A girl NEVER loses the right to her body, because it’s hers.
Her body, her life, her choices. You can agree or you can disagree, anyone is allowed to have different ideas and conceptions about morals, religion etc.
Still: who’s the uterus? =)
If you don’t agree go make a pro-lifer 14yo daughter pregnant, i’m sure they’ll thank you for that. -
share/reblog to win the items of your choice from this pic (other colours available) A winner will be picked at random on the 14th!
-
Reblog to win!
I am giving away this set of Purrfect Pineapples, cruelty free lingerie! There is no size on the label but I would say it is a S/M and would be okay for cup sizes up to a DD. :)
Only reblogs count as entries, I’m afraid!
This will close on the 15th May at midday, GMT!
A winner will then be chosen at random and the lingerie set will be sent out to you. You can enter no matter where you are in the world. :) Only one reblog per blog will count. Someone has reblogged this multiple times so don’t let that deter you as it will only count once!Good luck!
Photo by Corwin Prescott.
(I just extended this from the 8th May until the 15th because I wasn’t here and wanted to promote it a bit more!)
I really really want this >__<
(via maja-stina)
